Anti-Aging Therapeutics, volume 6, Chapter 3, 2004
American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine
Is Growth Hormone Replacement for
Normal Aging Safe?: Analysis of Current Medical Literature
Ronald Rothenberg, M.D,
Clinical Professor, Preventive & Family Medicine,
University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine:
Founder, California HealthSpan Institute
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether or not growth
hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) for the treatment of somatopause
of normal aging is safe and effective. In order to determine
this it is important to learn about growth hormone (GH), the
benefits of GHRT, and its side effects. We will also discuss
whether or not pathological GH deficiency is the same as GH
deficiency caused by "normal aging." The links between
GHRT and cancer and insulin resistance are also debated.
Keywords: growth hormone; growth hormone replacement
theory; growth hormone deficiency; inflammation
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether or not growth
hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) for the treatment of somatopause
of normal aging is safe and effective. This paper is not going
to deal with the basics of GHRT, i.e doses and optimal delivery
techniques. Instead it will address the following important
questions:
What are the benefits of GHRT
Is "Normal Aging" GH deficiency the same as "Pathological"
GH deficiency
Does GHRT increase the risk of cancer
Does GHRT cause insulin resistanc
Are the possible side effects of GHRT manageable nuisances or
serious problems
GROWTH HORMONE, SOMATOPAUSE, AND AGING
Growth hormone (GH) exerts a variety of physiological
effects on the body. Endogenous peptide ligands such as ghrelin,
growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), and growth hormone
releasing peptide (GHRP) all stimulate the interior pituitary
to release GH. GH migrates to the liver to produce insulin-like
growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Sixty percent (60%) of the effects
that GH has on the body are exerted via IGF-1. For example,
GH's anabolic effect upon muscle, bone, and cartilage, and its
lipolytic effect on fat, are all mediated by IGF-1. GH and IGF-1
can both pass through the blood-brain barrier.
Somatopause signifies the gradual decline in growth
hormone production by the pituitary gland. Somatopause can begin
anywhere between the ages of 35 and 50, however when it does
occur a person's GH levels will drop significantly. In an article
published in Hormone Research in 2000, Savine et al concluded
that life without growth hormone is poor both in quantity and
quality. The emphasis here should be placed on quality as maintaining
a good quality of life is the goal. Savine found that GH peaks
at puberty and starts decreasing at 21. At the age of 60, most
adults have the same 24-hour secretion rate indistinguishable
from those hypopituitary patients with organic lesions in the
pituitary gland. Thus, a normal 60-year old is the same as a
sick 25-year old in terms of GH levels. Savine also concluded
that if an IGF-1 level of 300 is mean normal for a 20 to 30-year
old, almost everybody over the age of 40 has an IGF-1 deficit.
However, what does GH have to do with aging? The
important factor here is inflammation. Chronic inflammation
is the cause of many age-related diseases. Thus doing whatever
we can to decrease chronic inflammation is important in the
quest to stay healthy. A number of things can be done to help
combat inflammation. For example: keeping glucose and insulin
levels under control, taking regular exercise, and eliminating
the visceral abdominal fat. Abdominal fat is a living, throbbing
endocrine organ that produces inflammatory cytokines, like IL-6.
So carrying extra fat is not just a cosmetic issue. By eliminating
visceral abdominal fat the person is also getting rid of a very
dangerous inflammatory-producing organ. It is also possible
to lower inflammation by controlling the Omega-3 to Omega-6
ratio and eliminating infections: most health professionals
are now aware of the connection between heart disease and periodontal
disease and chlamydia. Another way of combating inflammation
is stress reduction, as stress produces inflammatory cytokines.
Control of the free radicals, homocysteine levels, advanced
glycation end products, and youthful hormones, such as testosterone,
estrogens, growth hormone, and IGF-1 all decrease these inflammatory
cytokines. Inflammation induces GH insensitivity, however GHRT
decreases inflammation. Thus, reducing inflammation also improves
the body's sensitivity to GH.
We know that a person's C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
levels are the strongest predictor of whether or not they are
going to have a myocardial infarction or not. CRP is far superior
to LDL-cholesterol. Thus, it makes sense to keep CRP levels
as low as possible. Where does CRP come from? Interlenkin-6
(IL-6) tells the liver to produce CRP. So to keep CRP under
control, IL-6 levels also need to be kept at a minimum. Homocysteine
raises inflammation, therefore it needs to be kept low. Too
much insulin induces inflammation as does tumor necrosis factor-a
(TNF-a), as does interleukin-10 (IL-10): these are all things
that need to be kept under control. Inflammation is linked to
many chronic illnesses, from heart disease, to syndrome X, to
dementia, to depression, cancer, osteoporosis, and autoimmune
disease: all have high inflammatory mediators. Maybe the question
should be: "Why are we so inflammatory?"
Insulin resistance provides us with a good analogy
for understanding why the body is prone to inflammation. Insulin
resistance was a good thing for our Paleolithic ancestors. If
you could store fat and make it through famine, you would live
long enough to pass on your DNA. No one lived long enough to
develop Type II diabetes and its numerous complications, so
that was not a problem. It is the same thing with inflammation.
If a person's body is geared towards making inflammatory cytokines,
they will get by when a saber tooth tiger bites them. White
cells will rush to the infection and their blood will clot.
Being prone to inflammation is a bonus when faced with acute
trauma and acute infectious disease. As these two things were
the main challenge to our ancestors, it is in the genome. We
have evolved to be prone to inflammation. Now, since trauma
and infection are not such a great threat to most people, and
now that we are living significantly longer lives, this inflammatory
state is killing us. Just as the insulin resistance is killing
us.
Moving back to the original question of GH and
aging. We age because our hormones decline, not the other way
around GH is vital in order to live a healthy adult life. Why?
GHRT improves quality of life. What other benefits does GHRT
have? GHRT is beneficial to the brain, the cardiovascular system,
the immune system, aerobic capacity, body composition, and bone.
It is interesting to compare the viewpoints anti-aging
specialists and conventional endocrinologists have on GH. Both
groups agree that pathological GH deficiency is a disease that
should be treated. Both groups agree that GH secretion declines
with age, and both groups agree that GH decline is responsible
for part of the clinical syndrome of aging. This is where anti-aging
and endocrinology's agreement on GH ends. Anti-aging specialists
believe that aging and GH decline is a deficiency disease, which
can and should be treated. But the vast majority, if not all,
of endocrinologists believe that aging and GH decline are normal
and should not be treated.
Cappola et al carried out a study to investigate
what factors were associated with a better quality of life in
women aged 70 and over. The results showed that women who had
the best quality of life in terms of functional capability (that
is walking limitation, mobility, activities of daily living,
cognition and so on) had high IGF-1 levels and low IL-6. Thus
they had high GH levels and minimal inflammation. The concept
is that decreased GH levels and decreased IGF-1 levels lead
to frailty. Somatopause is the entry into frailty.
So, does GHRT provide us with the long searched
for fountain of youth? No, it does not. But we are on a programmed
course of destruction and GHRT could help slow it down a little
and improve our quality of life. If the benefits outweigh the
risks, then something is worth doing. GHRT is a work in progress.
It may not be perfect, but it is the best we have at present.
BENEFITS OF GROWTH HORMONE
Growth Hormone and the Brain
GH deficiency is associated with neurocognitive decline, and
GHRT improves memory, alertness, and concentration. It is quite
amazing that GH can pass through the blood brain barrier, as
it is a very large molecule made up from 191 amino acids. The
brain needs GH and it needs IGF-1. Many people think that GH
is good, whereas IGF-1 is bad, and that we want to increase
GH without increasing IGF-1. That is not the case. More than
half of the action of GH is exerted through IGF-1, and the general
consensus is that both are necessary. So growth hormone improves
cognitive capabilities, memory, motivation, and work capacity.
There are GH-receptors situated all over the brain. Aleman et
al correlated IGF-1 with cognitive function in men, with higher
IGF-1 levels being linked to better cognitive function. GH deficiency
was correlated with poor emotional and psychosocial functioning.
Growth Hormone and Bone GH increases the strength
and formation of cortical bone. Logobardi linked GH deficiency
with reduced bone density, and GHRT with reversal of osteoporosis.
Patients who sustain hip fractures tend to have lower IGF-1
levels. GH is synergistic with exercise, thus to get the maximum
effect from GHRT it has to be combined with regular exercise.
Van der Lely et al treated patients over 75 with hip fractures
with GH at the time of fracture for six weeks. The end point
was return to pre-fracture living arrangements. Results of the
double-blind placebo-controlled trial showed that 94% of patients
treated with GH returned to pre-fracture living within just
six weeks, compared with the 75% of control patients.
GH increases bone mineral density. Gillberg et
al treated men with idiopathic osteoporosis with GH. Participants
were randomly assigned to treatment with GH, either as continuous
treatment with daily injections of 0.4 mg GH or as intermittent
treatment with 0.8 mg GH for 14 days every 3 months. All patients
were treated with GH for 24 months, with a follow-up period
of 12 months. No positive effects of treatment were noted at
the 12-month follow-up. But after 12 months there was a continued
increase in bone mineral density and no significant adverse
effects were reported. After two years of GH treatment significant
improvement in bone mineral density were observed in both groups.
Growth Hormone and the Cardiovascular System
GH deficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality,
while GHRT is associated with improved cardiovascular function.
Research suggests that GHRT may help to reverse atherosclerosis,
improve cardiomyopathy, and reduce carotid intima media thickness.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines contribute to chronic
and acute heart failure. Adamopoulos et al treated patients
with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) with GH. Results
showed that GH treatment led to a significant decrease in both
TNF-a and IL-6 levels, and significant improvements in exercise
capacity.
GH also corrects endothelial dysfunction. Too
much emphasis is placed upon the cholesterol model of atherosclerosis.
Inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are very important
factors. Cholesterol may be present at the scene of the crime,
but it did not trigger the whole process going. GH improves
endothelial dysfunction, which plays a significant role is both
heart failure and arteriosclerosis.
What about homocysteine? We know that homocysteine
is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease. Sesmilo et
al randomly assigned 40 men with GH deficiency to treatment
with GH or a placebo for a period of 18 months. Homocysteine
levels fell significantly in those treated with GH.
What about CRP, which is the strongest predictor
of cardiovascular events that we have? CRP is very high is GH
deficiency. With GHRT, CRP decreases and visceral and subcutaneous
fat decreases. As we know, visceral fat produces IL-6, which
is turn produces CRP.
Thus, the cardiovascular improvements seen with
GHRT, appears to be down to its effect upon the inflammatory
pathway. IGF-1 is a cardiac hormone. It improves cardiac contractility,
stroke volume, and ejection fraction. It improves insulin levels:
intracardiac insulin levels, and increases insulin sensitivity.
So the heart needs IGF-1. Certainly, after myocardial infarction,
IGF-1 is critical in the remodeling of the heart ad recovery.
Growth Hormone and the Immune System
When considering GH and the immune system we have to look at
the bigger picture, that is, we have to consider the neuro-endocrine-immune
system as all part of one system. IGF-1 is vital for lymphocyte
maturation. It will restore age-related thymic involution in
rodents. IGF-1 is needed to develop T-cells and B-cells, and
the age-related decline in these important cells can be reversed
with GHRT.
Growth Hormone, Body Composition, and Obesity
It is a well-documented fact that GHRT can decrease visceral
abdominal fat, a cytyokine-producing organ, by as much as 50%.
According to Christiansen, GH deficiency is linked to:
Abnormal body composition
An increase in adipose mass and decrease in muscle mass
Insulin resistance
Decreased muscle strength
Long-term GHRT can normalize these abnormalities.
GH secretion is impaired in obesity. Johannsson
et al studied middle-aged men with low GH and abdominal obesity.
After nine months of treatment with GH, abdominal visceral fat
decreased by 18%, insulin sensitivity improved, total cholesterol,
LDL, and triglyceride levels dropped, and diastolic blood pressure
decreased. The men did not make any lifestyle changes during
the study. An 18% decrease in visceral abdominal fat without
making any lifestyle alterations is quite impressive.
Blackman et al studied the effect of treating
healthy men and women with sex steroids and GH. The women received
HRT, which was Estraderm (transcutaneous estradiol), plus Provera:
this was not a wise choice, as Provera increases insulin resistance.
The men were given 100mg of testosterone once every two weeks.
One group of men and women were treated with only sex steroids,
while another where also treated with GH at a fixed dose per
weight, which is not a good way to treat people with GH in terms
of producing side-effects Anyway, a fixed dose was used and
the patients where given GH three times a week. Results showed
that visceral abdominal fat decreased by 14% in men treated
with GH alone, and 16% in those given GH and testosterone. Interestingly,
women who were treated with GH alone did not lose abdominal
fat, but when GH was combined with HRT they did. A second study
by the same group was published a year later in 2002. The participants
were treated with the same regimen as in the 2001 study. Lean
body mass increased in women treated with HRT and GH by an average
of 2.1 kg, and in men treated with testosterone and GH by an
average of 4.3 kg. Fat mass decreased in both groups of men
and women. V0 max increased in both men and women, and muscle
strength increased by 6.8% in men treated with both GH and testosterone.
These changes occurred within six months, and once again, the
participants made no life-style changes: imagine what results
you may achieve by implementing positive life-style changes.
However, not all the results were beneficial: 38% of women suffered
from edema; 32% of men treated with both GH and testosterone
suffered from carpal-tunnel syndrome; and 41% of men treated
with GH suffered from arthralgias. Diabetes or glucose intolerance
was noted in 18 men treated with GH, compared with just 7 men
who were not treated with GH. Unfortunately, the press picked
up on the adverse effects reported by the research team, and
the resulting headlines read: "Growth Hormone Replacement
Therapy Causes Diabetes." People who use GH in clinical
practice know that this is simply not true. In terms of insulin
resistance, GH can make it worse if the patient's life-style
is not managed correctly. If lifestyle is not managed correctly
insulin resistance could improve dramatically. The very high
rate of side-effects seen with this study might be related to
the dosage schedule: the fixed dose per weight and the three
times a week; and not titrating the dose. This side-effect profile
is not seen in clinical practice. In clinical practice, approximately
10% of patients may suffer from such side-effects, however these
are manageable simply by decreasing the dose.
Other Benefits of Growth Hormone
Every study of GH and exercise capacity shows that GH increases
VO max. Gibney et al found a link between GH deficiency and
chronic fatigue and depression. Meanwhile, GHRT was found to
improve a person's sense of well-being and was associated with
an improved quality of life. Gilchrist et al concluded that
GH deficient adults have a poor quality of life, but that this
poor quality of life could be altered with GHRT. Gilchrist found
that GHRT significantly improved energy levels, vitality, anxiety,
depression, well-being, and self-control.
GROWTH HORMONE AND INCREASED MORTALITY IN PATIENTS
IN ICU
One study that is often brought up when people talk about GH
is a study by Takkala et al that was published in the New England
Journal of Medicine in 1999. In this study, critically ill patients:
half of whom were on ventilators, a lot of whom were suffering
with acute respiratory distress syndrome, were treated with
large doses of GH, 16 to 24 units per day. The average anti-aging
dose can very from 4 to 13 units a week or 1 unit a day. The
outcome was not good. Significantly higher numbers of patients
treated with GH died. So we can conclude that an overdose of
GH is not good. A rebuttal to this study by Bengtsson et al
in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology looked at a meta-analysis
of over 2,000 patient years, none of which was associated with
increase in mortality.
GROWTH HORMONE AND CANCER
Does GHRT increase the risk of cancer? Vance et al concluded
that there is "No evidence that GHRT affects the risk of
cancer or cardiovascular disease." Meanwhile Molitch concluded:
"Although there has been some concern about an increased
risk of cancer [with GHRT], reviews of existing, well-maintained
databases of treated patients have shown this theoretical risk
to be nonexistent. " Shalet et al concluded that there
is "No evidence of an increased risk of malignancy, recurrent
or de novo." On the package insert on GH it says don't
use in active malignancy. However, the Growth Hormone Research
Society published a paper in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology
saying that there is no data to support this labeling, and that
current knowledge does not warrant additional warning about
cancer risk. They say that this line should be removed from
the package insert because there is no evidence that GH increases
cancer recurrence or de novo cancer or leukemia.
When the issue of GH and cancer is being discussed,
the Chan study is always referenced. Blood was drawn for IGF-1
and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and other studies, on a
group of men. The blood was stored, and then 15 years later
the investigators followed-up the participants to see which
men developed prostate cancer. Men who had the IGF levels in
the highest quartile had the most prostate cancer. There are
some interesting aspects to this study. Firstly, the blood was
stored for 15 years. Secondly, the IGF levels in the highest
quartile were between 300 and 500. The average age of men at
the start of the study was 59. Now, it is unlikely people in
clinical practice will ever have seen someone of that age with
IGF levels of 400 or 500. This is why these study findings seem
very unusual.
IGFBP-3 is one of the blinding proteins that carries
IGF. This seemingly simple system is actually very complex.
All the binding proteins are hormones in their own right; they
do not just provide storage for the hormones. So the highest
quartile had a 2.4 times increased relative rise of prostate
cancer. When a patient is treated with GHRT, IGF-1 levels increase
and levels of IGFBP-3 also increase. Thus, GH stimulates the
production of both IGF and IGFBP-3. In the study by Chang et
al the men with more IGFBP-3 had a decreased risk of prostate
cancer.
IGFBP-3 has been called the guardian of the genome.
IGF-1 does have a mitogenic effect: it does cause cellular replication
and renewal. However, the mitogenic effect of IGF-1 is balanced
by the apoptotic effect of IGFBP-3. IGFBP-3 triggers apoptosis
in cancer cells. Thus IGFBP-3 plays an important role in cancer
control. However, too much apoptosis would cause cellular aging.
So it is important that the body gets the balance just right.
A study of 765 men by Scheafer et al found no
association with IGF-1 and prostate cancer. However, another
study by Baffa et al linked low IGF-1 levels with prostate cancer.
It is clear that we have conflicting evidence. However, if the
Chan study is the one and only reason to link GH with increased
risk of cancer, that reason is not valid.
GROWTH HORMONE REPLACEMENT AND SIDE-EFFECTS
The most common side-effects of GHRT are edema, arthralgia,
and insulin resistance. Vance et al concluded that edema and
arthralgia are related to the dose schedule. Patients that are
affected by edema or arthralgia are often being treated on a
low-frequency, high-dose schedule. They are also associated
with mg/kg does instead of a gradually increasing dose. Both
are reversible by simply decreasing the dose.
Another side-effect of GHRT is paresthesia. If
a patient complains of paresthesia, or edema, or arthralgia,
the best thing to do is stop their treatment for a few days,
decease the dose, and maybe treat them symptomatically with
NSAIDs or mild diuretics. Potassium replacement can also help
to ameliorate these symptoms. In rare cases, a patient cannot
tolerate GH. If their arthralgia or other adverse effect keeps
recurring, GHRT is not for them and should be discontinued.
GHRT can cause insulin resistance. But this can
be avoided if the patient is managed correctly. It is vital
that the patient eats correctly. We have the Atkins' diet, the
Zone diet, and the Paleolithic diet. All three of these diets
are pointing towards the same thing: that we need protein, good-quality
fats, and that we have to choose our carbohydrates carefully,
that is, obtain them from vegetables. So before a patient embarks
on an anti-aging program, it is vital that they eat properly.
Testosterone replacement therapy decreases insulin resistance.
And so a patient with borderline insulin resistance who wants
to be treated with GHRT may benefit from being treated with
testosterone first. Diabetics need to be advised that their
insulin requirements could go up or down.
Nam et al evaluated the effects of low-dose GH
therapy combined with diet restriction on changes in body composition
and insulin resistance in newly diagnosed obese type 2 diabetic
patients. The findings led them to conclude: "Low-dose
GH treatment combined with dietary restriction resulted not
only in a decrease of visceral fat but also an increase of muscle
mass with a consequent improvement of the insulin resistance
observed in obese type 2 diabetic patients." Remember,
obesity is another inflammatory disease. Abdominal fat makes
IL-6, and IL-6 causes insulin to go up and store more fat: thus
creating one big cycle.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, given the state of scientific medical knowledge
today, GH is safe. GHRT is associated with less morbidity and
mortality, less cardiovascular disease, less inflammation, improvements
in body composition, improvements in exercise capacity, and
a better quality of life. In the words of Peter Sonksen: "GH
is essential for normal adult life, and without it life expectancy
is shortened, energy and vitality are reduced, and the quality
of this life is impaired. The medical case for GH replacement
is now proven beyond any reasonable medical and scientific doubt.
REFERENCES
Adamopoulos S, Parissisc JT, Georgiadis M, Karatzas D, Paraskevaidis
J, Kroupis C, Karavolias G, Koniavitou K, Kremastios DT. Growth
hormone administration reduces circulating proinflammatory cytokines
and soluble Fas/soluble Fas ligand system in patients with chronic
heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Am Heart J. 2002; 144:359-364.
Aleman A, Verhaar HJ, De Haan EH, De Vries WR,
Samson MM, Drent ML, Van der Veen EA, Koppeschaar HP. Insulin-like
growth factor-I and cognitive function in healthy older men.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:471-475.
Baffa R, Reiss K, El-Gabry EA, Sedor J, Moy ML,
Shupp-Byrne D, Strup SE, Hauck WW, Baserga R, Gomelia LG. Low
serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1): a significant association
with prostate cancer. Tech Urol. 2000; 6:236-239.
Blackman MR. Age-related alterations in sleep
quality and neuroendocrine function: interrelationships and
implications. JAMA 2000; 284: 879-881.
Borson-Chazot F, Serusclat A, Kalfallah Y, Ducottet
X, Sassolas G, Bernard S, Labrousse F, Pastene J, Sassoas A,
Roux Y, Berthezene F. Decrease in carotid intima-media thickness
after one year growth hormone (GH) treatment in adults with
GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1329-1333.
Burgess W, Liu Q, Zhou J, Tang Q, Ozzawa A, VanHoy
R, Arkins S, Dantzer R, Kelley KW. The immune-endocrine loop
during aging; role of growth hormone and insulin-like growth
factor-1. Neuroimmunomodulation. 1999;6:56-68.
Cappola AR, Bandeen-Roche K, Wand GS, Volpato
S, Fried LP. Association of IGF-1 levels with muscle strength
and mobility in older women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:4139-4146.
Cappola AR, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Volpato
S, Fried LP. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and interleukin-6
contribute synergistically to disability and mortality in older
women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:2019-2025.
Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, Gann PH,
Ma J, Wilkinson P, Hennekens CH, Pollak M. Plasma insulin-like
growth factor-1 and prostate cancer risk: a prospective study.
Science 1998;279:563-566.
Christiansen J. Effects of GH upon body composition.
Growth Hormone in Adults, 1196. Cambridge University Press.
Clark R. The somatogenic hormones and insulin-like
growth factor-1: stimulators of lymphopoiesis and immune function.
Endocr Rev. 1997;18:157-179.
Gibney J, Wallace JD, Spinks T, Schnorr L, Ranicar
A, Cuneo RC, Lockhart S, Burnand KG, Salomon F, Sonksen PH,
Russell-Jones D. The effects of 10 years of recombinant human
growth hormone (GH) in adult GH-deficient patients. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 1999;84:2596-2602.
Gillberg P, Mallmin H, Petren-Mallmin M, Ljunghall
S, Nilsson AG. Two years of treatment with recombinant human
growth hormone increases bone mineral density in men with idiopathic
osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:4900-4906.
Gilchrist FJ, Murray RD, Shalet SM. The effect
of long-term untreated growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and 9
years of GH replacement on the quality of life (QoL) of GH-
deficient adults. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2002;57:363-370.
Hedstrom M. Hip fracture patients, a group of
frail elderly people with low bone mineral density, muscle mass
and IGF-1 levels. Acta Physiol Scand. 1999;167:347-350.
Johannsson G, Marin P, Lonn L, Ottoson M, Stenlof
K, Bjorntorp P, Sjostrom L, Bengtsson BA. Growth hormone treatment
of abdominally obese men reduces abdominal fat mass, improves
glucose and lipoprotein metabolism, and reduces diastolic blood
pressure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3604-3610.
Molitch ME. Diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults-how
good do the criteria need to be? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87:473-476.
Munzer T, Harma SM, Hees P, Shapiro E, Christmas
C, Bellantoni MF, Stevens TE, O'Connor KG, Pabst KM, St. Clair
C, Sorkin JD, Blackman MR. Effects of GH and/or sex steroid
administration on abdominal subcutaneous and visceral fat in
healthy aged women and men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 201;86:3604-3610.
Nam SY, Kim KR, Cha BS, Song YD, Lim SK, Lee HC,
Huh KB. Low-dose growth hormone treatment combined with diet
restriction decreases insulin resistance by reducing visceral
fat and increasing muscle mass in obese type 2 diabetic patients.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:1101-1107.
Nyberg F. Growth hormone in the brain: characteristics
of specific brain targets for the hormone and their functional
significance. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2000;21:330-348.
Pfeifer M, Verhovec R, Zizek B, Prezelj J, Poredos
P, Clayton RN. Growth hormone (GH) treatment reverses early
atherosclerotic changes in GH-deficient adults. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 1999;84:453-457.
Ren J, Samson WK, Sowers JR. Insulin-like growth
factor 1 as a cardiac hormone: physiological and pathophysiological
implications in heart disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:2049-2061.
Rothenberg R. Quality of Life Improves with GH
Therapy. Anti-Aging Medical News 2002; Summer-Fall: 34.
Rudman D, Feller AG, Nagraj HS, Gergans GA, Lalitha
PY, Goldberg AF, Schlenker RA, Cohn L, Rudman IW, Mattson DE.
Effects of human growth hormone in men over 60 years old. N
Engl J Med. 1990;323:1-6.
Schaeffer A. Science 1998;281:1285.
Sesmilo G, Biller BM, Llevadot J, Hayden D, Hanson
G, Rifai N, Klibanski A. Effects of growth hormone (GH) administration
on homocyst(e)ine levels in men with GH deficiency: a randomized
controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001; 86:1518-1524.
Shalet SM, Brennan BM, Reddingius RE. Growth hormone
therapy and malignancy. Horm Res. 1997;48 Suppl :29-32.
Slonim AE, Bulone L, Damore MB, Goldberg T, Wingertzahn
MA, McKinley MJ. A preliminary study of growth hormone therapy
for Crohn's disease. N Engl J Med. 2000;342: 1633- 1637.
Sonksen PH. Growth hormone replacement in adults
with GH deficiency-the first 10 years. Growth Horm IGF Res.
1998;8:275-276.
Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Adlard P, Preece MA.
Risk of cancer in patients treated with human pituitary growth
hormone in the UK, 1959-85: a cohort study. Lancet. 2002;360:273-277.
Swerdlow AJ, Reddingius RE, Higgins CD, Spoudeas
HA, Phipps K, Qiao Z, Ryder WD, Brada M, Hayward RD, Brook CG,
Hindmarsh PC, Shalet SM. Growth hormone treatment of children
with brain tumors and risk of tumor recurrence. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 2000;85:4444-4449.
Tacke J, Bolder U, Hermann A, Berger G, Jauch
KW. Long-term risk of gastrointestinal tumor recurrence after
postoperative treatment with recombinant human growth hormone.
J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2000;24:140-144.
Takala J, Ruokonen E, Webster NR, Nielsen MS,
Zandstra DF, Vundelineckx G, Hinds CJ. Increased mortality associated
with growth hormone treatment in critically ill adults. N Engl
J Med. 1999;341:785-792.
Van der Lely AJ, Lamberts SW, Jauh KW, Swierstra
BA, Hertlein H, Danielle De Vries D, Birkett MA, Bates PC, Blum
WF, Attanasio AF. Use of human GH in elderly patients with accidental
hip fracture. Eur J Endocrinal. 2000;143:585-592.
Vance ML, Muras N. Growth hormone therapy in adults
and children. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1206-1216.
Verhelst J, Abs R. Long-term growth hormone replacement
therapy in hypopituitary adults. Drugs 2002;62:2399-2412.
Weltman A, Weltman JY, Veldhuis JD, Hartman ML.
Body composition, physical exercise, growth hormone and obesity.
Eat Weight Disord. 2001;6:28-37.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
As a pioneer in the field of Anti-Aging Medicine, Ron Rothenberg,
M.D, was one of the first physicians to be recognized for his
expertise to become fully board certified in the specialty by
the American Board of Anti-Aging Medicine (ABAAM). Dr. Rothenberg
founded the California HealthSpan Institute in Encinitas, California
in 1997 with a commitment to transforming our understanding
of and finding treatment for aging as a disease. Dr. Rothenberg
is dedicated to the belief that the process of aging can be
slowed, stopped, or even reversed through existing medical and
scientific interventions. Challenging traditional medicine's
approach to treating the symptoms of aging, California HealthSpan's
mission is to create a paradigm shift in the way we view medicine:
treat the cause.
Dr. Rothenberg received his M.D from Columbia
University, College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1970. He performed
his residency at Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center and is
also board certified in Emergency Medicine. He received academic
appointment to the UCSD School of Medicine Clinical Faculty
in 1977 and was promoted to full Clinical Professor of Preventive
and Family Medicine in 1989. In addition to his work in the
field of Anti-Aging Medicine, Dr. Rothenberg is an Attending
Physician and Director of Medical Education, Department of Emergency
Medicine, Scripps Memorial Hospital in Encinitas, California.
Dr. Rothenberg travels extensively to lecture
on a variety of topics, which include Anti-Aging, Medicine and
Wilderness Medicine. He has published in the fields of Anti-Aging
Medicine and Emergency Medicine, and is the author of Forever
Ageless. He has been featured in the University of California
MD TV series in the shows on Anti-Aging Medicine and in the
NBC network news discussing anti-aging medicine.
Dr. Rothenberg is the Director of Medical Education
of the American Board of Mesotherapy and the Bissoon Institute
of Mesotherapy and has an active mesotherapy practice. Continuing
his quest to offer his patients the latest and most effective
medicine, he is amongst the first 15 physicians in the United
States to be board certified in this specialty.